Trump and Putin Shake Hands |
The most important thing, however is that President Putin had a chance to deny that he had compromising information about President Trump, and yet he didn't deny it.
Let’s
take another look at the rhetoric of silence – what it means when someone is
silent at times that call for speech. The most important event occurred when AP reporter Jonathan Lemire asked, “does
the Russian government have any compromising material on President Trump or on
his family?” Putin dodged the question. Let’s look at his response. The
first part of the response was:
“And now, to the compromising material.
Yeah, I did hear these rumors that we allegedly collected compromising material
on Mr. Trump when he was visiting Moscow. Well, distinguished colleague, let me
tell you this: when President Trump was at Moscow back then, I didn’t even know
that he was in Moscow. I treat President Trump with utmost respect, but back
then when he was a private individual, a businessman, nobody informed me that
he was in Moscow.”
This was
a basic non-denial. It reminded me of the non-denials
that the Nixon White House issued when accused of wrongdoing during the
Watergate crisis. The fact that he didn’t
know Trump personally does not mean that his intelligence agencies did not gather
compromising information. As anyone who has even read spy novels should know,
the Kremlin routinely gathers compromising information on distinguished foreign
visitors.
Here is
the second part of President Putin’s response:
Again, Putin denied nothing. He asked a question: “do you think that we try to collect compromising material on each and every single one of them?” He called the accusation “utter nonsense.” But he never answered even his own question. And he instructed the press to “just disregard these issues and don’t think about this any more again.” Those aren’t denials: a question, followed by a request, but no denial.
Now, does the
Russian government have compromising information about Mr. Trump? Of course, I
don’t know. I still have to wonder, however, why President Putin didn’t just
say, “No, I don’t have such information.” Suppose, for
example, that the police arrest somebody named Spike. The police ask Spike, “Did you steal the Volvo?" If Spike is innocent, Spike will say, “No, I didn’t.” If he is guilty, he might lie, but he might just
dodge the question. So, . . .
campaign speeches |
Thanks to Time magazine for the transcript. Image from White House Flickr page.
No comments:
Post a Comment