If you want people to believe something, prove it. It
is wicked to accuse people of doing something bad unless you have real evidence.
Alas, conspiracy theorists seem to dominate our political world – and here comes
the horrible case of accused pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Aren’t his
alleged crimes bad enough? Why do people have to add more wrongs by spreading
conspiracy theories? I'll look at some of the conspiracy theories, show why they are unproven, and give ways to tell real conspiracies from unproven conspiracy theories.
The Facts?
Jeffrey Epstein was found dead just this morning,
a reported suicide, and the Epstein conspiracy theorists instantly started to clog up Twitter. They popped up faster than mushrooms on a rainy day in Ohio. The conspiracy theorists provide, as usual,
no evidence for anything that they are saying. But since when has lack of
evidence ever worried a conspiracy theorist?
The facts as we know them so far are: Epstein, a
multi-millionaire who got rich with some sort of bizarre financial dealing, a friend
of the rich and famous, was
arrested and charged with many counts of sex trafficking and having sex
with minors. Placed in federal lockup, he attempted
suicide but, after several days, was taken off suicide watch, which gave
him a second chance to kill himself.
Epstein has been photographed in the company of underage
girls together with various famous personages, including President Donald Trump
and former President Bill Clinton. Authorities have found records and
videotapes that Epstein had made over the years, which might or might not mean that some famous
people are getting very anxious.
Still, evidence of a conspiracy is going to take
at least a matter of hours or, more likely, weeks or months, to emerge. If
famous people did arrange for his murder, they are surely smart enough to work
through intermediaries. They won’t be standing over the body with a bloody
rope. The fact that the conspiracy theories arose immediately is by itself
a sign that the conspiracy theorists are motivated by hatred, suspicion, or
malice, not by evidence.
Conservative
Nonsense
Conservatives, for example, are assuming that Bill
and Hillary Clinton have added Epstein to their so-called “kill list.” As is not
unusual for people their age, some of the Clintons’ associates have died of
various well-explained causes. Still, every time somebody remotely associated
with them dies, conservatives immediately add the name to their kill list. They
have no evidence that the Clintons had a thing to do with any of these deaths,
but the more conspiracy theories angry people come up with, the more evidence
they think they have found. They are wrong. Zero evidence plus zero evidence, plus zero, plus zero, plus
zero, equals zero. Every time.
My former philosophy professor William
P. Alston compared this sort of thinking to a group of dead people sleeping
together to stay warm. There is no evidence for any of the conspiracies, but
if you pile up enough conspiracies for which you have no evidence, well – well
– in real life – that doesn’t give you any proof that anyone conspired. You have
merely proved that, once someone is a target of smears, that person is always a
target of smears. The most suspicious conservatives have long called Hillary
Clinton “Killary,” just
to reinforce their conspiratorial thinking.
For example, a Twitter account under the name Right in Illinois said that, “Jeffery Epstein is dead along with others in the past who were going to spill the beams on the Clinton's.” (Yes, it says “beams.” No one ever said that conspiracy theorists know how to spell.) President Donald Trump himself retweeted a wild accusation that Hillary Clinton may have been behind Epstein’s supposed murder. The ultra-conservative website Before It’s News has already published an article speculating that Epstein’s death adds to the “Clinton body count.” Laugh out loud? No, this kind of thinking isn’t funny. Not at all.
For example, a Twitter account under the name Right in Illinois said that, “Jeffery Epstein is dead along with others in the past who were going to spill the beams on the Clinton's.” (Yes, it says “beams.” No one ever said that conspiracy theorists know how to spell.) President Donald Trump himself retweeted a wild accusation that Hillary Clinton may have been behind Epstein’s supposed murder. The ultra-conservative website Before It’s News has already published an article speculating that Epstein’s death adds to the “Clinton body count.” Laugh out loud? No, this kind of thinking isn’t funny. Not at all.
Liberal
Nonsense
Liberal conspiracy theorists, however, point out
that the prison was under Department of Justice control, that Attorney General
William Barr is an obvious Trump stooge, and therefore assume that Barr must
have arranged for his killing to protect President Trump. Although I have a low
opinion of Mr. Barr, I can’t imagine that he would do something that evil or
stupid, and there’s certainly no evidence that he did. That doesn’t stop the
conspiracy theorists. A Twitter user called Omar S. tweeted, “Epstein was held in a building under the control of Bill Barr
&; Trump. That's all you need to know.”
Anyway, there are thousands
of these tweets – literally – and that’s just on one social media outlet. And I
have yet to see any of them give any evidence: no eyewitnesses, no forensics,
nothing.
I’m seeing only about half as many of these silly
conspiracy theories from liberals as I am from conservatives, but even if
conservatives are tweeting this nonsense twice as often, it is no defense for
liberals to say they are only half as crazy.
Evaluating Conspiracy
Theories
How do you know that a conspiracy theory is
unsupported? I
blogged about this earlier. Here are some additional points:
First, when we have many conspiracy theories – Bill
Clinton did it, Hillary Clinton did it on behalf of Bill Clinton, Donald Trump
ordered it, or William Barr ordered it, we know right off that there isn’t
any evidence. Or someone thinks that Barr or some other official ordered Epstein to be taken off suicide watch hoping that he would die. I’ve seen a few tweets saying that Russian dictator Vladimir
Putin arranged for Epstein’s death to help Trump. That’s all speculation: if
the conspiracy theorists had evidence, the evidence would send them to a single
conspiracy theory.
Second, if you make an accusation against someone,
it is your burden of proof – and no one else’s – to give evidence that your
accusation is true. Debaters have known this ever since Richard Whately wrote about it centuries ago.
Third, if the conspiracy theory erupts before any
evidence is produced, you know that suspicion and fear, not reality, brought it
into existence. In music, comedy, chess, and conspiracy theorizing, timing is everything.
Fourth, questions aren’t evidence. Yes, important
questions should be answered. But are there unanswered questions? Of course. So what? As
life putters along, you will always ask more questions than you will hear answers. Questions
are just questions. Questions prove nothing. Deal with it.
Suspicion + fear = conspiracy theories. But only evidence gives us truth.
P.S.: Is it possible that some of Epstein’s rich
and famous friends are sex criminals? Yes, it’s possible, but I will wait to
make up my mind until I see the evidence. If they are guilty, I hope they get a
fair trial and a long prison sentence. If they are not proved guilty, stop accusing them. Proof: it’s a
good thing to have.
No comments:
Post a Comment